Author name: Rob Carr

Articles, Blog posts

How to Sue a Shrink

How to Sue a Shrink      By Robert Carter/November 3, 2024      We are not advocating here the willy-nilly suing of a psychiatrist. In this increasingly litigious society there are already far too many frivolous lawsuits.      However, if one suspects a psychiatrist has strayed from professional, legal or ethical standards of practice, one can report the individual to the state licensing board. There are also a number of websites with standard report forms to submit which list the specifics of the suspected transgression. CCHR and PsychSearch are two such reputable websites, and they immediately forward these reports to the appropriate authorities.      One can, of course, also sue a psychiatrist for malpractice, if the facts warrant it.      State laws do vary, but generally speaking, any time a medical professional’s actions no longer adhere to a standard of care used by the majority of responsible health care providers, a psychiatrist may be subject to a lawsuit as well as to discipline by a state medical board.      Here are the two most common categories of legal transgressions by a psychiatrist which show a level of negligence that would support a malpractice suit.      More practically, this list can also be used to assess for non-standard practices that should be reported to medical authorities, regardless if there are grounds for a successful lawsuit or not.      General unethical conduct: Having a sexual relationship with a patient Verbal or physical abuse Planting false memories in a patient. Trading medical treatment for other goods or services Failing to keep a patient’s medical information confidentialMedical malpractice:Failure to adequately deliver and have a signed Informed Consent procedure Not carrying out a thorough neurological evaluation when the condition calls for it Failure to adequately test and monitor a patient’s response to medication Any other significant p rescription medication errors Misdiagnosing a patient’s condition Failing to adequately monitor a patient, especially one with a risk of suicide Improper record keeping, including falsification of medical records      Should you sue a shrink?      Yes…if there are obvious grounds for it. Apparently, there often are.      The website PsychSearch offers a list of psychiatrists – state by state and country by country – who have either been disciplined by their medical boards or have been successfully prosecuted for medical and ethical “sins.”      It is not a short list.      In fact, according to a 2020 article in Clinical Psychiatry News, “Forty-one percent of U.S. psychiatrists have been sued for malpractice at least once.”      That’s close to a fifty/fifty chance you have that the psychiatrist you see has a practice…or that he has a malpractice.

Latest News

Chairman of Arkansas State Medical Board Hit with Medical Fraud

Psychiatrist and Chairman of Arkansas State Medical Board Hit with Medical Fraud Criminal Charges and over 100 Lawsuits      By Robert Carter/November 3, 2024      The trial of psychiatrist Brian Wyatt has recently been postponed to next spring because of his attorneys’ full schedule. Wyatt was arrested last year for two criminal charges of “large scale medical fraud” for billing Medicaid for appointments he never had with patients.      In early 2023 a confidential informant had reported Hyatt to the Arkansas medical authorities as director of Northwest Medical’s Behavioral Health in Springdale for “significant growth in the unit and likewise in the claims and billings submitted to Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance” under his time at the helm. Hyatt was arrested eight months later for two counts of large scale Medicaid fraud.      Since then more than 100 of Hyatt’s ex-patients have filed lawsuits against him for “unlawfully coercing, abusing and holding patients against their will” within the Springdale, Arkansas, Behavioral Unit in order to receive greater reimbursement from Medicare between 2018 and 2022.      One patient was charged over $14,000 for a five day stay at the unit, for example, but he never once saw Dr. Hyatt himself. In fact, Hyatt is reported to have issued orders to his staff to mark out his name on his patients’ wristbands so they would not know his name.      William VanWhy, one of the patients filing a lawsuit against Hyatt through the Odom Law Firm, reported that “I stayed there for about five days under Dr. Hyatt’s care. I have never seen him in my life. I’ve never met him, even though I was under his care. I asked to leave every day for the last three days and they wouldn’t let me leave.”      VanWhy’s insurance was then billed for two in-person visits during his stay, per reports, with his total charges in the tens of thousands of dollars.      Matt Lindsay of the Odom Law Firm also reported that many of his clients were chemically restrained, but never got any help in the unit. “Beyond not getting help, they got much worse, and they are still every day living with the effects of what they went through at that facility,” Lindsay said.      The initial informant about Hyatt had also reported that the psychiatrist was only on the floor for a few minutes each day and that he had no contact with patients.       Hyatt has pleaded not guilty to the two Medicaid criminal fraud charges.      One can’t help but wonder how much the spectacular – if utterly fraudulent – growth of the Springdale Behavioral Health Unit under his tenure was a factor in Hyatt achieving the position of Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board.      Certainly the psychiatrist did not arrive in that position because of his extraordinary and selfless care for his patients.

Latest News

Research Shows No Gene Causes Schizophrenia

Thirty Years of Research Show No Gene Causes Schizophrenia Robert Carter/August 27, 2024 After reviewing almost thirty years of research by The Human Genome Project, prominent biological psychiatrist E. Fuller Torrey has concluded that schizophrenia “does not appear to be a genetic disorder.” The Human Genome Project began in 1990 with the goal of determining all of the fundamental units that make up human DNA, and the human genome has approximately 3.1 billion of these base units. In August 2023 the final report was published by this publicly funded, multi-billion dollar project. The National Institute of Mental Health spent $8 billion in its own thirty year attempt to find a biological cause of various mental “illnesses” through the data collected in the Human Genome project. Schizophrenia was specifically targeted. After Dr. Torrey recently reviewed all of this research, though, he wrote that “not a single gene has been found that can be causally linked to schizophrenia and the research has produced no improvements in treatments.” The Human Genome Project is the largest collaborative biological research project ever done and its extensive research spans thirty years. If no gene has been found by the project which is shown to be a cause of schizophrenia, there is little likelihood one ever will be. Psychiatry’s theory of a “chemical imbalance” in the brain being the cause of a mental disorder is further debunked by this research, and Big Pharma’s subsequent launch of serotonin associated antidepressants to treat people’s “chemical imbalances” is shown to be, at best, foolhardy. Antidepressants sales in 2024 are estimated to be $17 billion. Quite a profit for Big Pharma. Not “foolhardy” for them.

Latest News

Pfizer/GSK Takes Another Big Financial Hit for Its Pharmaceutical Greed

Pfizer/GSK Takes Another Big Financial Hit for Its Pharmaceutical Greed      By Robert Carter/October 18, 2024      Big Pharma giant Pfizer/GSK agreed out of court this month to pay more than $2.2 billion to settle pending lawsuits against its product Zantac after the FDA pulled it from the market for being a possible carcinogen.      The culprit ingredient in Zantac, a heartburn medication, is ranitidine, a synthetic chemical concocted in one of Glaxo’s research laboratories in England in 1977. A “reverse pharmacology” approach was used to determine if modulating an existing biomolecule might have a therapeutic effect. This research technique might violate the “it’s not nice to mess with Mother Nature” axiom, but nevertheless the product was introduced to the market in 1981. By 1987 it had become the world’s biggest selling prescription drug.      It was not until almost thirty years later in 2019 that widespread reports — confirmed by an extensive Taiwanese study in 2022 showed evidence of ranitidine as potentially carcinogenic because of an inherent instability of the ranitidine molecule. The FDA ordered pharmaceutical manufacturers of products like Zantac which contained ranitidine to pull them from the market.      As the original patents for ranitidine had expired over the years, other pharmaceutical companies had entered competition for this lucrative market. Last month the French pharmaceutical giant Sanofi paid $100 million in out of court settlements to plaintiffs suing the company for its ranitidine product. This month Pfizer/GSK followed suit and settled their own lawsuits out of court for $2.2 billion.      When the initial clinical trials of a new pharmaceutical product are rushed to be completed — either as they are conducted or as their findings are written up for the FDA — the safety of a product for public consumption can be at risk. When that happens, the public themselves begin participating – unknowingly – in what is then virtually an extended clinical trial for the product.      It took thirty years for enough broad evidence of cancer in ailing consumers caused by the Pfizer drug to surface and cause the FDA to ban the product.      That evidence also arrived in the form of 80,000 lawsuits from Pfizer/GSK’s ranitidine product Zantac. It should be noted that Pfizer/GSK did not publicly accept any responsibility for a “faulty” produce, but said that they were only settling these lawsuits to mitigate future legal expenses for their company.      The FDA, which approved the drug, is not funded exclusively by the U.S. government, of course. Forty-five percent of its annual budget comes from the fees Big Pharma pays to apply for approval for a new drug, and seventy-five percent of the FDA’s antidepressant approval department comes from Big Pharma fees.      Zantac’s annual sales grew to more than $1 billion within five years of its release to the public. That’s quite a return on the comparatively modest approval fee paid to the FDA.      Even the $2.2 billion just paid to settle these lawsuits is a small price to pay for those decades of profit from Zantac.      The far heftier price was paid by those hundreds of thousands of people suing these Big Pharma firms because of the cancer they had suffered from ranitidine

Articles, Blog posts

“Chemical Imbalance” and “Major Depressive Disorder”: Pure Orwellian 1984 Newspeak

“Chemical Imbalance” and “Major Depressive Disorder”: Pure Orwellian 1984 Newspeak      By Robert Carter/October 17, 2024      “…but if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.”      George Orwell, author of 1984 and Animal Farm, wrote those words in his 1946 essay “Politics and the English Language.” Although his essay was a post-WWII warning about the manipulative use of language for political purposes, his analysis of the deterioration of a person’s ability to think clearly when using language that has been purposefully corrupted is pertinent to Big Pharma’s marketing of psychiatric medication.      Orwell argued that the deceitful use of language that is then placed into public use easily leads the public to accept ideas without examining them. If language has been corrupted by distorting the meaning of words, a new false vocabulary tends to prevent the public from thinking clearly enough to be able to reject the false terms in it.      Consequently, the purveyors of corrupted language can easily become the “authority.” The insider knowledge they claim through their distorted vocabulary — because it’s a false representation of reality — inhibits public access to actuality.      Corrupt and deceitful terms not only distort the language. They also distort the truth.      This insidious corruption of public thought is all the more dangerous because it is so subtle. In his novel 1984 Orwell called this technique of governmental brainwashing “Newspeak.”      It is the marketing tool used by Big Pharma and psychiatry today.      Take the term “chemical imbalance.” It has so fully entered the public consciousness – despite no laboratory test ever having given any proof that such a thing exists – that millions of Americans now freely ingest antidepressants based on this bogus theory that there’s a bodily chemical imbalance that can somehow be re-balanced by taking a psychotropic drug.      The American government doles out millions of dollars in funding for mental health initiatives based on the groundless idea of “chemical impbalance.” Last month alone, the Biden Administration gave grants of $68.5 million for behavioral health education, training and community programs, based on their acceptance of “chemical imbalance” as the cause of an already bogus psychiatric diagnosis for disorders such as Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).      Major Depressive Disorder is one more corruption of language by psychiatry which bends its definition away from truth, and that term has now become a popularized psychiatric buzz word. By labeling someone with MDD, antidepressants can then be prescribed…antidepressants that are dangerous enough to warrant the most severe of FDA black box warnings.      Like many other “disorders,” MDD was adopted by the American Psychiatric Association for inclusion in their 1980 edition of their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. That “diagnosis” – which, when called that, is made to sound like a valid medical term, but it is not — is only based on individual’s own reported experiences, and their behavior as reported by relatives or friends, along with a list of manifested symptoms. There is no laboratory test for this “disorder.”      However, Big Pharma was able to reap $18.5 billion in antidepressant sales in 2023 because of this manipulation of language that has convinced people that antidepressants are unequivocally good for them…even though 54.7 percent of Xanax users have attempted suicide or had suicidal thoughts.      Both of these terms – chemical imbalance and major mental disorder — have entered the public vocabulary courtesy of the $1 billion per month marketing expenditures of Big Pharma in America alone (2022 figure). These two misleading terms – as well as many others from the DSM – have corrupted the public’s ability to think clearly about mental illness. And therefore about the truth.      That’s a form of brainwashing.      This corruption of language has unfortunately prevented too many public from seeing that this Big Pharma emperor has no clothes on.

Latest News

Biden’s White House: Victim of Big Pharma Propaganda

Biden’s White House: Victim of Big Pharma Propaganda By Robert Carter/September 25, 2024 This month President Biden signed the bill to ease access for mental health treatments to 175 million Americans with private health insurance. This addendum to the Mental Health Parity Act will make it easier for those people to bill their insurance for mental health help, but it will also significantly increase the flow of dollars into Big Pharma’s antidepressant manufacturers. Biden announced this Big Pharma windfall by stating that it ensures that “mental health coverage will be covered at the same level as other health care for Americans. There is no reason that breaking your arm should be treated differently than having a mental health condition.” His parroting of the Big Pharma myth of the “chemical imbalance” theory of biological causes for mental disorders shows the extent to which Big Pharma’s mental health propaganda has penetrated American culture. That’s not surprising. Last year alone, 2023, Big Pharma spent almost $400 million lobbying congress to support pharmaceuticals and other health products. In fact, Biden himself is listed on opensectrets.org as the top benefactor ever of Big Pharma’s extravagant donations to congressmen. Biden has received over $9 million in donations from Big Pharma. In fact, one of the initial sponsors for the original Mental Health Parity Act in 1996, Senator Domenici, himself received over $150,000 in Big Pharma donations during his congressional career. It is true that mental health issues and substance abuse seem to be on the rise in America, and the passage of this bill will offer more help to those needing it in today’s stressful world. But is pharmaceutical “help” truly a benefit to those suffering if it is based on a debunked “chemical imbalance theory? Even the former Director of the National Institute of Mental Health is dubious of the value of this kind of mental health treatment. In 2017 he stated, “I spent 13 years at NIMH really pushing on the neuroscience and genetics of mental disorders, and when I look back on that I realize that while I think I succeeded at getting lots of really cool papers published by cool scientists at fairly large costs — I think $20 billion — I don’t think we moved the needle in reducing suicide, reducing hospitalizations, improving recovery for the tens of millions of people who have mental illness.” Joanna Moncrieff, a consulting psychiatrist at the North London National Health Service and Professor of Psychiatry at University College London, has said, “It is always difficult to prove a negative, but I think we can safely say that after a vast amount of research conducted over several decades, there is no convincing evidence that depression is caused by serotonin abnormalities, particularly by lower levels or reduced activity of serotonin. The popularity of the ‘chemical imbalance’ theory of depression has coincided with a huge increase in the use of antidepressants. Many people take antidepressants because they have been led to believe their depression has a biochemical cause, but this new research suggests this belief is not grounded in evidence.” “This belief,” however, is grounded in huge profits for Big Pharma, which has spent untold billions convincing the public and politicians of the validity of this bogus theory.

Articles, Blog posts

Why Psychiatrists Can’t Think Straight

Why Psychiatrists Can’t Think Straight      By Robert Carter/September 25, 2024      A hundred years ago psychiatrists began trying to “cure” an individual’s depression and anxiety – his “schizophrenia,” they called it – by jolting his body into a grand mal seizure.      Insulin shock “therapy” and electroconvulsive shock “therapy” were the brutal tools they used with no measurable “cures’ attained other than the erasure of a person’s memory and, therefore, of the trials and tribulations he might have undergone in life. He was a zombie.      When these inhumane procedures were finally widely revealed to the public in the late 1940s – because they had mostly been administered covertly behind the shadowed walls of psychiatric hospitals – psychiatrists switched to the use of psychotropic drugs to “correct the chemical imbalances in the body” they said were the cause of depression and anxiety. Those also produced zombies.      They still do that. Almost 17 percent of all Americans over twelve years of age are taking an antidepressant today.      No scientific study has found any evidence of a chemical imbalance in the body which is causing mental “illness.” Undeterred, psychiatrists – in collusion with Big Pharma and the FDA — have now launched more studies into genetic disposition and nerve cell circuits in the brain to find exclusively bodily causes for mental illness.      So, what’s the fatal error in their thinking?      That a person is his body. For some reason, psychiatrists have been unable to distinguish between the body and the individual. Everyone who is alive is aware that they have a body. If they take a second, they can  perceive their hands, their feet, their necks, even that large bone atop their spine which we call a head. If one can perceive something, one has to be separate from it. For example, the reason we can perceive a wall in a room is because we are not the wall. If we were the wall, we could not perceive it. There would be no separation.      So too with bodies. Anyone alive can perceive their body. That means they ain’t it. The tribulations of the individual are not necessarily alleviated by addressing a body.      How did psychiatry get so far removed from common sense that they say the individual is a body? How did they get so far away from being able to think clearly?      With their basic premise wrong, that an individual is only a body – like some rat in a laboratory cage — all the conclusions they draw on how to help him — by giving him a lobotomy or electroshock therapy or a psychotropic drug, for instance — will also be wrong.

Latest News

Supreme Court Overturns Purdue’s Bankruptcy

Justice Served as Supreme Court Overturns Purdue’s Bankruptcy Attempt to Protect the Sackler Family’s Opioid Fortune      By Robert Carter/September 18, 2024      The Sackler family lawyers are in the process of rewriting their bankruptcy filing because the Supreme Court has just overturned their first attempt to protect the Sacklers after they had moved $11 billion of the Purdue opioid profits into their personal accounts.      Justice Gorsuch wrote in the court’s ruling that “The Sacklers have not filed for bankruptcy or placed all their assets on the table for distribution to creditors, yet they seek what essentially amounts to a discharge. No provision of the code authorizes that kind of relief.”      Purdue Pharma has been facing a multitude of lawsuits for knowingly and fraudulently marketing OxyContin as non-addictive. In the first bankruptcy filing that was overturned, the Sackler family had offered to pay $6 billion in reparations for their part in creating the opioid epidemic, but Justice Gorsuch noted that they had sheltered their company’s opioid profits from the Purdue bankruptcy and had transferred $11 billion of company profit to their own personal account.      In exchange for the reparations, the original bankruptcy filing would have also shielded Purdue and the Sacklers from any future lawsuits against them. Paying $6 billion in reparations after pocketing $11 billion is a pretty small price to pay for that kind of immunity.      Between 1999 and 2021 nearly 650,000 people died from an opioid overdose, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention has reported. Many states are still negotiating with other opioid manufacturers such as Johnson and Johnson, Teva and Allergan for settlements. Total payout from these settlements could reach $50 billion.      Purdue was the largest marketer of opioids to physicians and was particularly aggressive in itsbroad advertising of OxyContin. In 2001 alone it spent $200 million on marketing OxyContin despite knowing the dangers of the opioid. Purdue earned over $35 billion from total OxyContin sales.      “Today is a very good day for justice,” said Ed Bisch, whose 18 year old son overdosed on OxyContin in 2001. Bisch now directs Relatives Against Purdue Pharma. Unfortunately, no justice has yet been meted out to the FDA, which allowed those false claims by Big Pharma, which downplayed the risks of opioids, to continue for nearly twenty- five years without correction.      Big Pharma was motivated by profit. What was the FDA motivated by?      In 2021, 75 percent of the FDA drug division budget — $1.1 billion — was paid for by user fees that Big Pharma is charged when they apply for FDA approval of a medical drug or device. 45 percent of the total FDA budget is paid for by these same Big Pharma fees.      That’s probably pretty good motivation to maintain the FDA collusion with Big Pharma.

Articles, Blog posts

Psychiatrists: Covert Architects of Human Destruction

Psychiatrists: Covert Architects of Human Destruction      By Robert Carter/September 18, 2024      We know of psychiatry’s dark pre-WWII history in Europe.      Austrian psychiatrist Manfred Sakel’s 1927 development of seizure-producing insulin coma therapy to “treat” schizophrenia. Psychiatrist Ugo Cerletti’s 1938 use of the brutal electroconvulsive therapy he had learned from watching pigs being prepared for slaughter, also to “treat” schizophrenia. Nazi psychiatrists supervising the murder of almost 100,000 “unfit” humans in their euthanasia program gas chambers from 1939-1941.      But what about over here in the New World after the war?      Psychiatry’s human destruction continued, but more covertly, in America and Canada in the 1950s through the CIA initiated and psychiatrist run “human experiment” programs such as Project Artichoke and MKUltra. For twenty years unsuspecting subjects were given massive doses of LSD, heroin, morphine, mescaline, and sodium pentothal — usually without their knowledge or consent — in an attempt to develop efficient methods for interrogation. Other unethical mind control procedures and methods were also used, with and without drugs, under the guise of “scientific research.”      A key figure in these now infamous MKUltra mind control experiments was a prominent figure in the world of psychiatry, Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron. He served as president of the American Psychiatric Association and president of the Canadian Psychiatric Association as well as the chairman of the World Psychiatric Association. Between 1953 and 1966 he was employed by the Central Intelligence Agency to develop procedures and to experiment with drugs that would weaken an individual through brainwashing and psychological torture and force a confession from him during interrogations.      Psychiatrists such as Cameron used the MKUltra program to hone their procedures for manipulating subjects’ mental states and brain functions through covert and extensive use of LSD. Electroshock, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, verbal abuse, and other types of illegal torture were also used on the unwitting subjects, who were often chosen because they were easy prey: incarcerated criminals, active military, or students who were lied to about the purpose of this “research.”      Psychiatrist Cameron not only used LSD on his subjects, but such paralysis causing drugs as curare, and he also electroshocked them with a voltage cranked up to thirty to forty times its normal setting. He developed a procedure he called “psychic driving” to “de-pattern” subjects. He would put his victims into drug induced comas for weeks at a time while playing a looped tape of recorded statements that could act as implanted commands on them.      Earlier, in the late 1940s, Cameron had given a lecture entitled Dangerous Men and Women in which he described certain mentally ill personalities that he believed were a marked danger to all members of society. Cameron thereafter espoused and promoted the idea that a society in which psychiatry built and then developed the institutions of government, of schools, of prisons and of hospitals would be a society in which science triumphed over its dangerous and “sick” – that is, mentally ill — members.      Perhaps Cameron saw the MKULtra programs as an opportunity for him to fulfill that evil goal.      Cameron stated, “Get it understood how dangerous these damaged, sick personalities are to ourselves – and above all, to our children, whose traits are taking form — and we shall find ways to put an end to them.”      His ideas of ethnic cleansing paralleled the Nazi psychiatrists’ justifications for the extermination of 100,000 of the “impure” in their gas chambers. Now Cameron was working for an American intelligence agency. Different masters. Same agenda.      There is a further dark irony here. Cameron’s purpose to purge society of its “dangerous” personalities – the mentally ill — actually ended up creating through his MKUltra work two of the most dangerous criminals in modern American history: Whitey Bulger and Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber.      Both were unsuspecting victims of the MKUltra experiments.      Whitey Bulger, while serving an early jail sentence in 1957 – long before his infamous and brutal criminal career from the 1970s to the 1990s — was given LSD every day for a year, per an NPR report. He had volunteered for what he thought was a beneficial research program in exchange for a reduced jail sentence.Instead he spent the rest of his life never able to sleep more than an hour or two at a time because of chronic nightmares and hallucinations.      After successfully remaining at large for sixteen years, he was finally apprehended and convicted in 2013 of eleven murders of the nineteen he was accused of.      Domestic terrorist Ted Kaczynski, a child genius accepted into Harvard when he was only sixteen, underwent a total of two hundred hours of verbal abuse in the MKUltra program experiments while at Harvard. Kaczynski was submitted to “vehement, sweeping and personally abusive” verbal punishment that attacked his ego and his cherished beliefs and ideas in order to cause a high level of stress in him as a participant in the experiments.      These sessions lasted for three years.      In an article written for the Atlantic in 2000, professor Alton Chase wrote that by the time Kaczynski had graduated from Harvard, “all the elements that would ultimately transform him into the Unabomber were in place.”      After living as a recluse in a Montana cabin for decades, in 1998 Kaczynski was finally apprehended after the longest and most extensive investigation in the history of the FBI. He pleaded guilty to murdering three people and injuring twenty-three others with his mail bomb campaign.      Charles Manson and Sirhan Sirhan, Senator Robert F. Kennedy’s assassin, are also alleged to have been the unwitting subjects of the MKUltra experiments.      Not only were Bulger’s and Kaczynski’s lives destroyed by these MKUltra experiments, so too were the lives of the almost two dozen victims of these two crazed, psychiatric mind control subjects.      During MKUltra’s twenty year span, more than thirty universities and institutions had been used to find unknowing subjects for 149 projects involving these psychiatric experiments.      Cameron himself was paid $69,000 dollars to do his research at McGill University.      Who knows how many other destroyed personalities are out there as a result of MKUltraprograms?

Latest News

Psychiatrist Henry Jarecki Sued for Sex Trafficking

Jeffrey Epstein Associate, Psychiatrist Henry Jarecki, Sued for Sex Trafficking a Young Woman By Robert Carter/August 21, 2024 In June this year 91 year old billionaire psychiatrist and associate of Jeffery Epstein, Dr. Henry Jarecki, was sued by a woman sixty years his junior for raping her for years and turning her into a “modern day sex slave.” The woman, who the court has approved to remain anonymous, states that Epstein had referred her to the psychiatrist to whom he had regularly referred his sexual victims. The suit states that Jarecki often shared the medical records of these women with Epstein. Epstein told this victim that Jarecki was “the best doctor in New York City.” When she met him at his apartment for her first appointment, an “initial mental health consultation,” she discovered otherwise. Jarecki told the woman that he had something that would make her feel happy right away and presented her with an expensive wristwatch. Then he guided her into his bedroom and raped her. He then coerced her under threat of jeopardizing her immigration status to move into an apartment he set up for her nearby his home and forced her for the next three years to have sex with him and with others he sent there. He also took her to his private Virgin Island retreat, an island 14 miles from Epstein’s famous Little St. James, which he had purchased a year after Epstein bought his island in 1998. He sexually trafficked the woman there, as well.Jarecki has denied the accusations. “I had a consensual, non-secretive, and mutually respectful relationship when she was a successful professional in her late 20s,” he has claimed. Gloria Jarecki, the psychiatrist’s wife of 57 years, has not made any public comment about the lawsuit. Although Jarecki’s association with Jeffrey Epstein makes this case more newsworthy, sexual  exploitation or assault by psychiatrists is not all that uncommon. Ten percent of all psychotherapists have actually admitted to sexually molesting their patients. Some studies estimate that that figure is actually as high as 25 percent and one California estimated the figure at 48 percent. Psychiatrists also divorce more often than any other type of doctor, but apparently Gloria Jarecki has not gotten that memo.

Scroll to Top